From exercise creation to marking. The AI assists. The teacher decides.
CORRAICT is the all-in-one teaching assistant, designed by and for teachers. It supports them at every stage: creating exercises, marking against their own marking schemes, and generating personalised feedback for students. Designed to work equally well as a standalone tool or fully integrated with an educational group's information system, CORRAICT meets GDPR and AI Act requirements.
Marking takes time. So does creating. And good teaching notes take even more.
A teacher's work around an assessment goes beyond marking. There is everything that comes before — designing relevant exercises — and everything that follows — writing clear teaching notes for students. Each of these stages takes hours.
A huge hidden cost
Between designing an exam, marking submissions, and writing teaching notes, a teacher can easily spend 10 hours a week on tasks that AI can now assist with. Multiplied by the number of teachers in your group, the total cost is considerable.
Inconsistent quality
Not all teachers have the time to design ambitious exercises or write detailed teaching notes. Quality varies from one class to another, and even from one assessment to the next.
Feedback returned too late
By the time a student receives their marking and teaching notes, the exam is often a distant memory. The learning opportunity has passed, and the feedback becomes a mere grade rather than a pedagogical tool.
Three capabilities. One assistant.
CORRAICT operates at all three stages of the teaching cycle. The AI suggests; the teacher approves. At no point does it decide on the teacher's behalf.
Create exercises
Instructions generated from your subject's syllabus and your brief, which you can amend as many times as needed before locking them in.
Read the pageDuring MarkingMark submissions
Each submission assessed against your marking scheme, criterion by criterion, with the justification supporting each point. You arbitrate, you approve.
Read the pageAfter the assessmentProduce Teaching notes
An annotated solution that explains the approach and common mistakes, written once for the exercise and reviewed by you.
Read the pageEveryone is looking for something different.
A head of institution, a teacher and a student don't have the same question. Here is the page written for yours.
Groups & universities
Scope, roles, deployment, governance and cost: what CORRAICT asks of your institution, and what it gives back.
Read the pageTeachTeachers
Three objections, three answers, and a full end-to-end assessment walkthrough. Your marking scheme does the work; you have the final say.
Read the pageAlignAcademic leadership
Bringing a team's marking schemes closer together without measuring individuals, and driving change without resorting to circulars.
Read the pageUnderstandStudents
What the student receives, what AI did in their teaching notes, and who reviewed them before they were sent.
Read the pageThe three questions asked before signing.
The exact role of AI when marking a submission, what the integrity of an assessment allows you to say — and above all what it does not — and how your data is handled. One page per question.
CORRAICT fits into your organisation, not the other way around.
- Each exercise carries the RNCP skills block it assesses.
- An API to push grades and create accounts from your own system.
- A rollout that starts with one class, never with the whole institution.
Ready to free up time for teaching?
A 30-minute demo is enough to see whether CORRAICT is right for your institutions. No commitment, no installation.